Author uses physiological, psychological and clinical examples to place the aesthetic problem of architecture within an ethical context. Drawing on a clinical report and an experiment in perception, he argues that perception consists largely of invention on the part of the perceiver. He disputes the possibility of an objective reality, and outlines the opposition between objectivity and ethics and, likewise, between "monologic" and "dialogic." His discussion of the distinction between denotation and connotation leads to conclusions concerning the role of ethics in architecture. Article is an adaptation of a 1975 speech.
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une licence CC BY 4.0 / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 license