History of Art Bibliography

Help

Export

Selection :

Permalink
http://openbibart.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=oba_0126464

Artist vs. connoisseur : the Committee of National Monuments and the arbitration of taste

Author
Gur, Michael E.
Document type
Article (journal)
Language
English
Source
Southeastern College Art Conference review. 1994, Num. 4, Vol. 12, 259-264, 4 ill.
ISSN
1043-5158
Abstract (en)
Discusses the responsibility of the Committee of National Monuments for the disappointing quality of a series of large-scale sculpted monuments erected in S. Paul's, London, in the early 19th c., including works of Thomas Banks, John Charles Rossi, and John Bacon the younger; publicly funded, the memorials were commissioned 1798-1823 by Parliament to honor of British military heroes who had fallen or given extraordinary service in the struggle against Revolutionary France. The issue was whether artists or connoisseurs, in this case the Royal Academy or the British Institution for Promoting the Fine Arts (founded 1805) and the Committee of National Monuments, should be the judges of quality in works of art.
Subject (en)
Subject (fr)

Origin

DatabaseBHA (Inist-CNRS/GRI)

Identifier19951001-00320783

Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une licence CC BY 4.0 / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 license