Discussion of aspects of the relationship between art and history with respect to the discipline and methodology of art history. Clayson proposes that a visual artifact must be interpreted in terms of factors external to it. Cummins argues that art and history are never equal and that the tension between them creates an opportunity for historical materialism. Kampen discusses problems she has encountered as a feminist working on Roman art when the terms art and history are so unstable. Powell examines issues of vision and revisions within the discipline of art history and their relevance to what is defined as art history, focusing on the case of James Hampton's Throne of the Third Heaven of the Nations Millenium General Assembly (Washington, DC, National Museum of American Art). Powers examines the problem of connecting the multiple histories of diverse peoples, and observes that the discipline of art history cannot avoid implication in debates about diversity and multiculturalism. Werckmeister reports examples of a recoil from history on the part of American audiences (students and public, 1993-1994), contrasting with his own efforts to focus more directly on a political history of art, dealing with the key terms communism, fascism, and democracy as competing ideologies in 20th c. public art.
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une licence CC BY 4.0 / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 license